![]() Data may be intentionally delayed pursuant to supplier requirements. FactSet (a) does not make any express or implied warranties of any kind regarding the data, including, without limitation, any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use and (b) shall not be liable for any errors, incompleteness, interruption or delay, action taken in reliance on any data, or for any damages resulting therefrom. Source: FactSetĭata are provided 'as is' for informational purposes only and are not intended for trading purposes. Change value during other periods is calculated as the difference between the last trade and the most recent settle. Change value during the period between open outcry settle and the commencement of the next day's trading is calculated as the difference between the last trade and the prior day's settle. Sources: FactSet, Tullett PrebonĬommodities & Futures: Futures prices are delayed at least 10 minutes as per exchange requirements. Sources: FactSet, Tullett PrebonĬurrencies: Currency quotes are updated in real-time. Sources: FactSet, Dow Jonesīonds: Bond quotes are updated in real-time. Sources: FactSet, Dow JonesĮTF Movers: Includes ETFs & ETNs with volume of at least 50,000. Stock Movers: Gainers, decliners and most actives market activity tables are a combination of NYSE, Nasdaq, NYSE American and NYSE Arca listings. Overview page represent trading in all U.S. ![]() Indexes: Index quotes may be real-time or delayed as per exchange requirements refer to time stamps for information on any delays. Copyright 2019© FactSet Research Systems Inc. Fundamental company data and analyst estimates provided by FactSet. International stock quotes are delayed as per exchange requirements. stock quotes reflect trades reported through Nasdaq only comprehensive quotes and volume reflect trading in all markets and are delayed at least 15 minutes. But it tells us a lot, and this time-honored metric shows that a realistic reading dwarfs the official P/E that’s already flashing red.Stocks: Real-time U.S. ![]() The Shiller P/E doesn’t tell us everything, and in the Apple example, that gigantic multiple of 61 is misleading. Even if we assume that profits will trend downward to $5, still almost 70% over pre-pandemic levels, what you’re really paying now is more like 40 times base earnings. The Shiller P/E math suggests that we should sharply discount Apple’s current, and already falling, profits to get an accurate picture of the price you’re paying versus the earnings it can consistently deliver. But its current multiple of 33, high though it is, doesn’t tell the full story either. Its quarterly profits have been declining since mid-2022, indicating that at least part of the COVID rocket ride was a one-time phenomenon.Ī reasonable view is that the CAPE of over 60 is too high and exaggerates how overpriced Apple really is. Still, it’s unlikely that Apple’s $100 billion in total earnings and over $6 in EPS notched in 2022 form a new, solid launch pad. The pandemic clearly created a fresh liftoff for its products and services, some of which will retain its power. On paper, Apple’s CAPE of over 61 puts it in the super-priciest of realms. How realistic is the CAPE in assessing whether Apple is hugely expensive? ![]() It’s also double the present elevated CAPE for U.S. The highest CAPE ever recorded for the S&P was 44, set during the dotcom bubble in mid-1999. Divide that $3.15 into its share price of $192 on July 5, and you get the Shiller P/E of 61. Over the next 12 months, profits exploded, jumping 62% to $6.08 in FY 2021, and surmounting 8% inflation to beat that level in 2022 at $6.11.Īveraging the past decade of profits, updated for inflation, yields a CAPE EPS of $3.15. In FY 2013 (ended September 30), the iPhone maker notched $1.82 in inflation-adjusted EPS, doubling the figure to $3.75 in 2020. Right now, it’s 30.9, extremely high compared to the long-term averages. Shiller calculates the CAPE only for the entire S&P. It deploys not current results, but a 10-year average of EPS, marking up past years for inflation. And that’s just the formula the CAPE provides. Hence, you’d get a much more realistic estimate of what Apple’s providing in dollars of profit for every $100 spent on its stock by using not today’s inflated EPS, but a metric for bedrock, repeatable earnings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |